See the full document here.
Beginning
on January 1 2014, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires that all
(non-grandfathered) individual and small group health insurance plans sold in a
state cover certain essential health benefits (EHB’s). In January 2013, the Eating
Disorders Coalition (EDC) surveyed all of fifty states and the District of
Columbia’s proposed benchmark plans and discovered a wide disparity in the anticipated
mental health service coverage between states.
Executive Summary
There exists a wide
disparity in anticipated mental health and substance abuse service coverage
between states, particularly as it relates to residential care and eating
disorder care. This troubling disparity
is of great concern for people struggling with eating disorders and other
mental health and substance abuse issues across the country.
According to our survey,
twenty-seven of the benchmark plans severely limit mental health services.
Seventeen of these plans have day limits on mental health services and nine
states have exclusions for residential services. In some cases, the states with
limits on mental health do not have the same limits on substance abuse
services; in other cases limits are extreme for both mental health and
substance abuse. Given that similar limits are not seen in medical services, the
disparity on quantitative day limits and unequal exclusionary status should not
be allowed under Mental Health Parity.
In contrast, our review
indicates that twenty-four states have strong mental health coverage, without
non-equitable service limits. Vermont has the strongest coverage for eating
disorders and Connecticut, Idaho, and Maine also having very strong plans.
With half of the states
including equitable coverage for mental health and substance abuse services,
there is strong evidence that plans can and do include equitable and inclusive
treatment for mental health and substance abuse. There is a pressing need for
the other half of the nation to provide for inclusive coverage of these
illnesses. As the benchmark plans are implemented, it is imperative that states
offer equitable and adequate access to care for people suffering with mental
health conditions, including eating disorders. It is also imperative that all
Benchmark plans follow Mental Health Parity.
We urge advocates to monitor and influence the implementation in their
states, specifics for each state can be found at http://healthreform.kff.org/state-exchange-profiles-page.aspx.
Download the entire document here.
No comments:
Post a Comment